Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cossette, Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:35, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Cossette, Inc.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Cossette, Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Marketing company that fails WP:NCORP, can't find any good non-primary sources related to it. Sources that are in the article are of concern, and the biggest source, the CBC article, only briefly mentions the company. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 02:09, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 09:41, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:14, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

• Weak Delete, seems surprising given the age of the company and finding it listed here in Bloomberg, but I too could not find much from a google search on the company. And by not much, I really me not much else. Given that, barring any new sources, I support a delete per the nom.— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 04:10, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

• Week Delete Sources mostly only mention the company in passing, but there are a few that make it the main subject in an article HeliosSunGod (talk) 05:08, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.